Harsh Ratings
Harsh Ratings
What games do you think had too harsh ratings? Every time I see the review for Sabre Wulf I can't understand why it got something like 47%, I think there was a definite bias against this game because it was a year old and originated on the Spectrum, especially when Robin Of The Wood got a Sizzler in the same issue and that's pretty much the same game with some prettier graphics, although pretty much as exciting as Sabre Wulf. I'm not saying that it should have gotten Sizzler or anything, but I would say that a 75%+ mark would have been the starting point for this one..
-
- King of Zzap Towers
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 6:45 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: Harsh Ratings
/runs in and shouts Delta and runs away again very quickly!!!Fizza wrote:What games do you think had too harsh ratings?
I must admit that I quite liked Sabre Wulf at the time - Played it for longer than some of the higher-rated games!
I also liked Underwurlde whcih got a bit of a mixed review (From memory Gary Penn didn't like it?).
I think you have a point about the reviewers being against anything speccy originated - Though in the case of Brian Bloodaxe, they were right!
I also liked Underwurlde whcih got a bit of a mixed review (From memory Gary Penn didn't like it?).
I think you have a point about the reviewers being against anything speccy originated - Though in the case of Brian Bloodaxe, they were right!
Contributor to Def Tribute to ZZAP!
Compilation64 - http://compilation64.zzap64.co.uk/
Crazy about the C64? - www.lemon64.com
Amiga Anguish? - www.lemonamiga.com
Compilation64 - http://compilation64.zzap64.co.uk/
Crazy about the C64? - www.lemon64.com
Amiga Anguish? - www.lemonamiga.com
Yeah, Brian Bloodaxe was poor I'll agree there, not a good game on the Speccy either IRRC. I think Boulderdash II was another example, although it begrudgingly got a sizzler, if you didn't have the first one then it had to be as an essential purchase as the first one, if not more because of the extra levels...
- Professor Brian Strain
- King of Zzap Towers
- Posts: 787
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 2:22 pm
- Location: Skegness, UK
- Contact:
Re: Harsh Ratings
Bah! Beat me to itIain wrote:/runs in and shouts Delta and runs away again very quickly!!!Fizza wrote:What games do you think had too harsh ratings?
- Lloyd Mangram
- King of Ludlow
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:22 pm
- Location: Ludlow
- Contact:
Re: Harsh Ratings
Blame the other Gaz.gravy wrote:Bah! Beat me to itIain wrote:/runs in and shouts Delta and runs away again very quickly!!!Fizza wrote:What games do you think had too harsh ratings?
Once again I emerge from beneath a massive pile of paper which makes my desk groan to bring you the world’s most amazing posts.
- Professor Brian Strain
- King of Zzap Towers
- Posts: 787
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 2:22 pm
- Location: Skegness, UK
- Contact:
-
- King of Zzap Towers
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 6:45 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Horses for courses. I agree totally with Gary Penn—I much more enjoyed the mix-e-load (and Hubbard's in-game score) than the game itself, which I found tedious and frustrating. It was more like a memory test than a shoot 'em up. Frankly, I still believe Zzap! over-rated the game, although I know I'm in a minority there!
As for Nemesis, I didn't think much of that one either, and would have knocked the Overall score down by 15 per cent or so.
Thinking about it, I don't think I agree with most of the scores Zzap! ever gave Thalamus games:
The Apex games, although good fun, were all flawed in some way and didn't, in my opinion, deserve such high ratings. Creatures would have just about Sizzled in my book, but Retrograde soon became boring, while Creatures 2 was a serious pain in the backside to play. Of the other Gold Medal games, only Armalyte really has a strong claim: Hawkeye was over-rated, while the fact Nobby the Aardvark got 96% is something of a joke.
Some of the Sizzlers were pretty mind-boggling, too. Sanxion: 93%? There must have been "happy water" in Zzap! towers that day. Similarly, Winter Camp's high rating was surprising (as was the 80% dished out to the truly appalling Summer Camp, which would have scored about 50% in my book).
Still, there were some odd under-ratings, too. While Heat Seeker's 75% was perhaps due to the game's strangeness, how Hunter's Moon failed to get a Gold Medal is beyond me, as it's one of the best shoot 'em ups ever created. Similarly, Snare should have at least Sizzled, and its 88% seems very low—perhaps this was down to the iffy graphics.
As for Nemesis, I didn't think much of that one either, and would have knocked the Overall score down by 15 per cent or so.
Thinking about it, I don't think I agree with most of the scores Zzap! ever gave Thalamus games:
The Apex games, although good fun, were all flawed in some way and didn't, in my opinion, deserve such high ratings. Creatures would have just about Sizzled in my book, but Retrograde soon became boring, while Creatures 2 was a serious pain in the backside to play. Of the other Gold Medal games, only Armalyte really has a strong claim: Hawkeye was over-rated, while the fact Nobby the Aardvark got 96% is something of a joke.
Some of the Sizzlers were pretty mind-boggling, too. Sanxion: 93%? There must have been "happy water" in Zzap! towers that day. Similarly, Winter Camp's high rating was surprising (as was the 80% dished out to the truly appalling Summer Camp, which would have scored about 50% in my book).
Still, there were some odd under-ratings, too. While Heat Seeker's 75% was perhaps due to the game's strangeness, how Hunter's Moon failed to get a Gold Medal is beyond me, as it's one of the best shoot 'em ups ever created. Similarly, Snare should have at least Sizzled, and its 88% seems very low—perhaps this was down to the iffy graphics.
-
- Freelancer
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:48 am
- Location: Dorset
-
- King of Zzap Towers
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 6:45 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
According to this site's very own Zzap! Bible Mr. Tracy amassed a whopping 11%.brian_dead wrote:what rating did dick tracy get? that game licked balls.
-
- Freelancer
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:48 am
- Location: Dorset